Blog

  • Who Created God?

    Who Created God?

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxL8AwT7ObY&feature=player_embedded]

    The above video is of philosopher/mathematician John Lennox discussing the schoolboy argument, “who created God?”.  This is often a question that many atheists pose when a Christian states that God is the cause for the universe.  However, have many Christians really thought about it?  It is important to check out our views and rationale for God being a timeless being and knowing how to properly respond to such a question.  You might find that it may be a little more difficult than you originally thought. 

    Using the Kalam Cosmological Argument, we see that:

    1)     Anything that begins to exist has a cause.
    2)     The universe began to exist
    3)     Therefore the universe has a cause.

    Not only philosophically is this true, but scientifically as well.  A vast majority of scholars in the field of cosmology hold that the universe is not timeless but had a beginning.  Therefore, we see that since it began to exist, it therefore must also have a cause.  Our universe is contingent upon this cause.  Since the universe is contingent upon this cause, this cause must be a timeless, omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and a even personal being to create a universe that is so finely tuned that if only one of the hundreds of physical constants goes astray, life on this planet would be impossible for habitation. 

    Given the above description of the Kalam Cosmological argument, we see that our universe had a cause, which is God.  This is where this question, “who made God?” starts to come into play.  I recently heard a good analogy on this.  If you were to visit Mt. Rushmore, you would acknowledge the fact that the President’s faces did not carve themselves into the side of the cliff.  You would realize that sculptors designed the President’s faces and took the time to carve their faces into the cliff.  However, would you need an explanation for who created the sculptor in order to answer the question, “how did the President’s faces get carved into the side of this cliff?”.  ABSOLUTELY NOT!  Therefore the same method applies here; you do not need an explanation for the cause of the universe to explain whether or not the universe was caused. 

    Prominent atheist Richard Dawkins uses this question as one of his foundational arguments against God in his book, “The God Delusion”.  As Dr. Lennox discusses in the video, Dawkins must be under the false assumption that we are talking about created Gods.  This is obviously not the case in the matter of the universe.  Many other prominent atheist writers are also finding creative ways to get around there being an initial cause.  One example would be Daniel Dennett who claims that the universe caused itself (I’m not joking) or Lawrence Krauss who believes the universe came into being from nothing as the title of his newest books suggests, “Universe from Nothing”.  Other atheists hold to the universe being eternal to avoid there being an initial cause.  However, this is stance that cosmological science has refuted for decades.

    No matter how you look at it, there was an initial cause for the universe.  Regardless of how you want to justify the cause, whether it is through simply denying it because you can’t explain the cause (Dawkins), declaring that the universe had the power to create itself (Dennett), or whether it randomly came into being from nothing (Krauss), a cause is inevitable for the universe.  As for me, I place my faith in God. 

  • Evolution for the Christian…

    Evolution for the Christian…

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9h-hmlMz5c&feature=player_embedded]

    Above is a video of Dr. William Lane Craig discussing the Biblical perspective on evolution.  This is a topic of great sensitivity for many Christians as many Christians are committed to a literal interpretation of the creation account found in Genesis.  However, are we Biblically obligated to a six day creation?  Is there a set interpretation of Genesis that would obligate all Christians to believe in a six day creation?  There are many Christians that believe in a six day creation however this view isn’t supported with modern day science.  From an exegetical stance, we find that there isn’t any verbiage within Genesis or elsewhere that would indicate to its readers that the creation was literally completed by God in six 24 hour days.  God wants us to love Him with all of our heart, soul, and our minds.  As Christians, it is important to be open to where the evidence leads us without fear that it will contradict our Lord.  Christians should welcome all scientific evidence because it will ultimately reinforce our belief in God.

    In this video, Dr. Craig highlights the improbability of Darwinian evolutionary theory as it accounts for the massive complexity of biology.  Dr. Craig states that, “If evolution did occur on this planet, it was literally a miracle, and therefore evidence for the existence of God”.  As Christians, we should feel secure in following the evidence where it leads us.  As for atheists, evolution is “the only game in town” because they have no other explanation to account for the origination of living organisms on this planet.  As it stands today in modern biology, it is still a mystery as to how the first single-cell organism originated.  The atheist has to justify how being came from non-being in the biological sense as well as the cosmological sense.  In all matters of origin (whether we speak of organisms or the universe), the atheist is placing faith that science will one day justify how things such as living beings and universes come into existence without causation.  Now…that is blind faith. 

  • What should Christians be familiar with?

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsU_K_gE0xA&feature=player_embedded]

    A professor at Southern Evangelical Seminary, J.T. Bridges, is asked what topics Christians should be the most familiar with.  Bridges proposes that Christians should be able to articulate reasons why God exists when speaking with a skeptic.  In a society that is becoming increasingly secular while not knowing exactly why, it is important that we can adequately justify our reasons for believing the way we do. 

     The second topic we should become familiar with is the topic of suffering.  The existence of suffering is used against Christians because many skeptics presuppose that suffering is incompatible with the existence of God.  However, is that truly the case?  I agree that the nature of God and evil are incompatible however evil and free moral agents are not.  As you know, free moral agents have caused much of the suffering in the world outside suffering caused by natural evil (hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, etc…). 

     We must understand the omniscience of God.  We, as free moral agents, are not capable of comprehending why moral and natural evils take place and what their long term consequences will be.  Some skeptics may propose that if God is truly omniscient, why couldn’t he just not create those who would be evil?   If God selectively created perfect moral beings, there would be no free will that would allow us to make conscious decisions of right or wrong or willingly accept or reject Christ.  Without free will, these decisions would be out of our authority to make because our perfect moral nature wouldn’t allow us to choose anything outside perfectly moral decisions.  We see that our free will provided by God allows us to make good and bad choices.  God understands that forced love is not truly love at all. 

     These are just a couple thoughts to ponder and possibly further investigate.  I’ve included an article that provides even greater insight into the topic of suffering:

    http://www.reasonablefaith.org/why-does-god-permit-suffering-to-continue

    1 Peter 3:15: “But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect”

  • Historical Resurrection of Christ

    Historical Resurrection of Christ

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0Dc01HVlaM&feature=player_embedded]

    Above is a video of prominent New Testament historian N.T. Wright discussing the resurrection of Jesus.  N.T. Wright wrote extensively on this specific topic of the resurrection of Jesus in his book, “The Resurrection of the Son of God”.  He is considered to be one of the world’s most reliable sources for information on the topic of the resurrection of Jesus.  In the video, Wright briefly explains how the massive expansion of the Christian faith is purely explained by the divine resurrection of Jesus Christ.  In addition, Wright regards the alternative theories that contradict the claim of the resurrection as unfitting for the circumstances of the era because they fail to carry the explanatory scope adequate enough to explain the Christian movement in the centuries following the resurrection of Christ. 

    Below is a link to the book, “The Resurrection of the Son of God” written by N.T. Wright.  Personally, I feel this book is a valuable resource for all Christians who want to know Christ on a deeper level.

    http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Resurrection-of-the-Son-of-God/N-T-Wright/e/9780800626792

  • Religulous – Was Jesus Copied?

    Religulous – Was Jesus Copied?

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6AZqOO2FJA&feature=player_embedded]

    For those of you who have seen the “documentary” by Bill Maher called “Religulous”, you’ll recall that Maher feels he has a knockdown argument against Christianity by claiming that Jesus was merely a carbon copy of pagan gods prior to his birth.  Obviously, this would be a huge implication for the Christians if that had been true.  However, it’s not.  I’ve included a video of Christian philosopher and New Testament historian Dr. William Lane Craig that discusses this specific topic.

    I’m not going to take the time to list out the many inaccuracies of Maher’s “Religulous” because I think that would honestly be giving it more credit than it deserves.  For those that are interested in looking more into the credibility of the accusation that Jesus was a mere copy of early pagan gods, I’ll include a link to a book (referenced in the video) that delves into great detail concerning how it is impossible for Jesus to have been the product of pagan gods…

    I believe that if you currently have doubts because of this objection, they’ll quickly fade away once you do some research using reliable sources…and not comedian Bill Maher. 

  • Does God Exist?

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbAtCb9K_zs&feature=player_embedded]

    This video includes highlights from a debate between John Lennox and Richard Dawkins on the topic, “Does God Exist?”   By presenting this video I hope to inspire those who lack the confidence to share the Christian faith and defend it when necessary.  From my experience, those who criticize the Christian faith and its followers are typically ignorant of it.  The belief that science has buried Christianity couldn’t be farther from the truth.  Those that have been persuaded by the propaganda that science has defeated God are content with dismissing the evidence that points towards a divine Creator.  Hopefully this video will aggressively challenge the proposition that God has been dismissed and comfort those that have had doubts concerning this matter.